← Back to Poland Portfolio
HPC & AI Factory — Land Acquisition Site Analysis

W. Warsaw / Nadarzyn 50–150 MW

A+ for connectivity. Every operator, every IXP (PLIX, TPIX, Thinx, EPIX). EXA Project Visegrád (mid-2026) = new hyperscale backbone. Best for smaller 30-50MW customer-facing facility.

Site ID#8
Overall TierA+
VoivodeshipMazowieckie
Grid (DSO)PGE
Coordinates52.1802°N, 20.7644°E
RecommendationPROCEED — Prestige Facility
Overall TierA+16-Factor Assessment
Power TierA50–150 MW
Fiber TierSALL operators
Composite3.95A — Weighted Score

Key Strengths

  • 🏆 ALL IXPs: PLIX, TPIX, Thinx, EPIX — Poland's undisputed #1 connectivity hub
  • EXA Project Visegrád (mid-2026) — new hyperscale backbone Warsaw→Frankfurt→Vienna
  • S-tier workforce — all major universities, 2M+ metro, Poland's capital
  • PSE earmarked 1,200MW for Warsaw DCs by 2034

Key Risks

  • Expensive land — PLN 250-350/sqm in Nadarzyn area
  • Grid congestion — competing DC operators and urban demand
  • Better suited for smaller prestige facility than 160MW AI Factory
01

Power & Grid Infrastructure

WEIGHT: 25%
1
Power Availability
A
PGE strong grid. PSE earmarked 1,200MW for Warsaw DCs by 2034. Grid congestion risk.
2
HV Grid Proximity
A
Multiple 110/220kV substations in Warsaw metro. PGE infrastructure dense.
02

Connectivity & Fiber

WEIGHT: 15%
3
Fiber / Connectivity
S
EVERY operator: Orange, Exatel, HAWE, Atman, RETN, Arelion, Lumen, Cogent, EXA. ALL IXPs.
4
Fiber Operators (Validated)
S
ALL operators present. PLIX (130+ peers), TPIX, Thinx, EPIX. EXA Visegrád anchor.
03

Land & Infrastructure

WEIGHT: 20%
5
Land & Expansion
B
Nadarzyn area has available plots but expensive. Urban sprawl competition.
6
Transport Access
S
A2 motorway + Chopin Airport. Poland's transport hub.
7
Zoning / Permitting
B
Industrial zoning available in Nadarzyn. Standard DC permitting.
8
Scalability (>200MW)
C
Urban constraints + high costs limit mega-campus. Best for 30-50MW facility.
04

Environment & Climate

WEIGHT: 15%
9
Water / Cooling
A
Vistula River. Excellent water supply options.
10
Natural Disaster Risk
A
Low natural disaster risk. Stable geological conditions.
11
Climate / PUE
A
Central Poland. Good PUE vs Western Europe.
05

Economic & Workforce

WEIGHT: 25%
12
Workforce & Talent
S
Capital city 2M+ metro. All major universities. Deepest talent pool in Poland.
13
SEZ / Tax Incentives
A
Polish Investment Zone eligible. Various industrial zones in suburbs.
14
Political Support
B
Capital city dynamics. General tech support but no deep DC relationships.
15
Market Proximity
S
#1 domestic + CEE market. All enterprise customers. Highest demand density.
16
Land Cost
C
PLN 250-350/sqm. Among most expensive in portfolio. Warsaw premium.
06

Weighted Composite Score

Power & Grid — avg 4.00 × 0.251.00
Connectivity — avg 5.00 × 0.150.75
Land & Infrastructure — avg 3.25 × 0.200.65
Environment & Climate — avg 4.00 × 0.150.60
Economic & Regulatory — avg 3.80 × 0.250.95
COMPOSITE SCORE3.95 / 5.00 → A
07

16-Factor Scoring Matrix

#FactorTierScoreCategory
1Power AvailabilityA4Power & Grid
2HV Grid ProximityA4Power & Grid
Power & Grid Average4.00× 0.25 = 1.00
3Fiber / ConnectivityS5Connectivity
4Fiber Operators (Validated)S5Connectivity
Connectivity Average5.00× 0.15 = 0.75
5Land & ExpansionB3Land & Infrastructure
6Transport AccessS5Land & Infrastructure
7Zoning / PermittingB3Land & Infrastructure
8Scalability (>200MW)C2Land & Infrastructure
Land & Infrastructure Average3.25× 0.20 = 0.65
9Water / CoolingA4Environment & Climate
10Natural Disaster RiskA4Environment & Climate
11Climate / PUEA4Environment & Climate
Environment & Climate Average4.00× 0.15 = 0.60
12Workforce & TalentS5Economic & Regulatory
13SEZ / Tax IncentivesA4Economic & Regulatory
14Political SupportB3Economic & Regulatory
15Market ProximityS5Economic & Regulatory
16Land CostC2Economic & Regulatory
Economic & Regulatory Average3.80× 0.25 = 0.95
COMPOSITE TOTAL3.95A — PROCEED
08

Location Data

Coordinates52.1802°N, 20.7644°E
Google MapsOpen in Maps →
VoivodeshipMazowieckie
Grid DSOPGE
Fiber PrimaryALL operators
Power ConfirmedTBD — PSE earmarked 1,200MW for DCs by 2034
09

CEE Portfolio Context

CountryTierCapacityStatus
🇵🇱PolandS2 GW+Phase 1 under construction. 20 sites assessed. Stargard (S-tier) primary.
🇷🇴RomaniaA369 MWAvram Iancu — 369MW PV+BESS co-location. Grid-connected. In planning.
🇧🇬BulgariaA1 GWIn planning. Kozloduy nuclear corridor. Strong grid.
🇨🇿Czech RepublicB+200 MWUp next. Prague metro + industrial zones. NIX.CZ IXP.
🇪🇪EstoniaB+100 MWUp next. Tallinn data hub. Cool climate. Nordic connectivity.
🇭🇺HungaryB150 MWBudapest metro. BIX IXP. Paks nuclear proximity. Evaluate.
🇱🇹LithuaniaB100 MWVilnius/Kaunas. LINX node. Baltic interconnection. Evaluate.
🇱🇻Latvia / SlovakiaB–50 MWEarly evaluation. Riga / Bratislava metro areas.
🇭🇷Croatia / SloveniaC50 MWEvaluate. Zagreb / Ljubljana. Limited grid. Emerging markets.
🇷🇸Serbia, BiH, OthersDMonitor only. Regulatory uncertainty. Grid instability.

Strategic Recommendation

PROCEED — Prestige Facility

A+ connectivity — Poland's #1 hub. Every operator, every IXP. EXA Visegrád anchor (mid-2026). PSE earmarked 1,200MW for Warsaw DCs by 2034. But expensive and congested. Best deployed as 30-50MW customer-facing prestige facility, not 160MW AI factory. Different unit economics, different purpose than Stargard.