← Back to Poland Portfolio
HPC & AI Factory — Land Acquisition Site Analysis

Żary 20–50 MW

C-tier overall, D-tier fiber = DISQUALIFYING. No IXP within 170km. No metro fiber. No dark fiber. 38K town = no workforce. Not viable for 160MW AI Factory.

Site ID#5
Overall TierC
VoivodeshipLubuskie
Grid (DSO)ENEA
Coordinates51.5289°N, 15.2276°E
Recommendation❌ DROP — Disqualified
Overall TierC16-Factor Assessment
Power TierC20–50 MW
Fiber TierDHAWE (limited)
Composite2.5B — Weighted Score

Key Strengths

  • Cheap land — rural Lubuskie pricing
  • Near German border — potential DACH connectivity angle

Key Risks

  • ❌ D-tier fiber — No IXP within 170km (DISQUALIFYING)
  • ❌ No metro fiber and no dark fiber infrastructure
  • ❌ 38K town — zero DC workforce
  • Weakest grid position in portfolio (Lubuskie = remote from major HV)
  • Would need $2-5M+ new fiber build — not economically viable

⚠ Disqualifiers

D-tier fiber connectivity — No IXP within 170km. No metro fiber. No dark fiber. Would need $2-5M+ new fiber build. DISQUALIFYING for 160MW AI Factory.

38K population — completely insufficient workforce for data center operations.

01

Power & Grid Infrastructure

WEIGHT: 25%
1
Power Availability
C
Lubuskie = weakest grid. Remote from major HV. Pumped-storage hydro (Dychów) nearby but insufficient.
2
HV Grid Proximity
C
No confirmed HV substation capacity. ENEA rural distribution only.
02

Connectivity & Fiber

WEIGHT: 15%
3
Fiber / Connectivity
D
DISQUALIFYING. No IXP within 170km. No metro fiber. No dark fiber. HAWE border ring routing unclear.
4
Fiber Operators (Validated)
D
HAWE border ring routing unclear. No other operators confirmed locally.
03

Land & Infrastructure

WEIGHT: 20%
5
Land & Expansion
A
Rural = large cheap plots. Near German border.
6
Transport Access
B
Near German border. Basic road connections. No major motorway.
7
Zoning / Permitting
C
Agricultural conversion needed. Rural permitting.
8
Scalability (>200MW)
C
No infrastructure foundation for scaling. Grid and fiber both limiting.
04

Environment & Climate

WEIGHT: 15%
9
Water / Cooling
B
Adequate but not exceptional water resources.
10
Natural Disaster Risk
A
Low natural disaster risk. Not in major flood zone.
11
Climate / PUE
A
Western Poland climate. Favorable PUE conditions.
05

Economic & Workforce

WEIGHT: 25%
12
Workforce & Talent
D
38K town. Zero tech workforce. No university. Not viable for DC staffing.
13
SEZ / Tax Incentives
A
Polish Investment Zone eligible. Tax incentives available.
14
Political Support
C
No relationships. Small rural municipality.
15
Market Proximity
B
Near German border but no connectivity to leverage proximity.
16
Land Cost
S
Among cheapest land in Poland. Rural Lubuskie <€5-10/sqm.
06

Weighted Composite Score

Power & Grid — avg 2.00 × 0.250.50
Connectivity — avg 1.00 × 0.150.15
Land & Infrastructure — avg 2.75 × 0.200.55
Environment & Climate — avg 3.67 × 0.150.55
Economic & Regulatory — avg 3.00 × 0.250.75
COMPOSITE SCORE2.5 / 5.00 → B
07

16-Factor Scoring Matrix

#FactorTierScoreCategory
1Power AvailabilityC2Power & Grid
2HV Grid ProximityC2Power & Grid
Power & Grid Average2.00× 0.25 = 0.50
3Fiber / ConnectivityD1Connectivity
4Fiber Operators (Validated)D1Connectivity
Connectivity Average1.00× 0.15 = 0.15
5Land & ExpansionA4Land & Infrastructure
6Transport AccessB3Land & Infrastructure
7Zoning / PermittingC2Land & Infrastructure
8Scalability (>200MW)C2Land & Infrastructure
Land & Infrastructure Average2.75× 0.20 = 0.55
9Water / CoolingB3Environment & Climate
10Natural Disaster RiskA4Environment & Climate
11Climate / PUEA4Environment & Climate
Environment & Climate Average3.67× 0.15 = 0.55
12Workforce & TalentD1Economic & Regulatory
13SEZ / Tax IncentivesA4Economic & Regulatory
14Political SupportC2Economic & Regulatory
15Market ProximityB3Economic & Regulatory
16Land CostS5Economic & Regulatory
Economic & Regulatory Average3.00× 0.25 = 0.75
COMPOSITE TOTAL2.5B — ❌ DROP
08

Location Data

Coordinates51.5289°N, 15.2276°E
Google MapsOpen in Maps →
VoivodeshipLubuskie
Grid DSOENEA
Fiber PrimaryHAWE (limited)
Power ConfirmedTBD — Weakest grid in portfolio
09

CEE Portfolio Context

CountryTierCapacityStatus
🇵🇱PolandS2 GW+Phase 1 under construction. 20 sites assessed. Stargard (S-tier) primary.
🇷🇴RomaniaA369 MWAvram Iancu — 369MW PV+BESS co-location. Grid-connected. In planning.
🇧🇬BulgariaA1 GWIn planning. Kozloduy nuclear corridor. Strong grid.
🇨🇿Czech RepublicB+200 MWUp next. Prague metro + industrial zones. NIX.CZ IXP.
🇪🇪EstoniaB+100 MWUp next. Tallinn data hub. Cool climate. Nordic connectivity.
🇭🇺HungaryB150 MWBudapest metro. BIX IXP. Paks nuclear proximity. Evaluate.
🇱🇹LithuaniaB100 MWVilnius/Kaunas. LINX node. Baltic interconnection. Evaluate.
🇱🇻Latvia / SlovakiaB–50 MWEarly evaluation. Riga / Bratislava metro areas.
🇭🇷Croatia / SloveniaC50 MWEvaluate. Zagreb / Ljubljana. Limited grid. Emerging markets.
🇷🇸Serbia, BiH, OthersDMonitor only. Regulatory uncertainty. Grid instability.

Strategic Recommendation

❌ DROP — Disqualified

DROP THIS SITE. D-tier fiber is disqualifying for any data center operation. No IXP within 170km (nearest: WRIX Wrocław). No metro fiber infrastructure. No dark fiber availability. 38K town provides zero workforce for DC operations. Would need $2-5M+ new fiber build before any DC feasibility. Redirect all resources to Polkowice or Gliwice.